Duffy Archive Limited v. Wheatley et al
| Duffy Archive Limited |
| Kayci Wheatley and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2019cv01000 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Response to #1 Complaint by Kayci Wheatley.(lt) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kayci Wheatley. (cj) |
| Filing 4 Report on Copyright sent to Register of Copyrights, along with a copy of the Complaint. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Duffy Archive Limited. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright by Duffy Archive Limited. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Duffy Archive Limited. (Tehranian, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12726151), filed by Duffy Archive Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tehranian, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
