Bess v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Christopher Bess
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01006
Filed: October 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2020 Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert Pitman: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 1/17/2020 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Pamela Andasola.)(dm)
January 15, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE Concerning Reference to United States Magistrate Judge by Christopher Bess (Owen, Martha)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER resetting Initial Pretrial Conference for 1/17/2020 09:40 AM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
January 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, ( Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/15/2020 at 09:40 AM before Judge Robert Pitman,). Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
December 18, 2019 Filing 6 Proposed Scheduling Order by Christopher Bess. (Owen, Martha)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Martha Powell Owen for Christopher Bess. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
October 24, 2019 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Christopher Bess. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Owen, Martha)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dl)
October 17, 2019 Filing 2 Supplement to JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.. (Aguilar, Leticia)
October 16, 2019 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)
October 16, 2019 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin. (dl)
October 16, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Christopher Bess. (dl)
October 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12731341), filed by Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Moscowitz, Barry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bess v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Represented By: Barry A. Moscowitz
Represented By: Leticia P. Aguilar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Bess
Represented By: Martha Powell Owen
Represented By: Philip Durst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?