Commercial Flooring System, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc. et al
| Commercial Flooring System, Inc. |
| Hunt Construction Group, Inc. and RLI Insurance Company |
| 1:2019cv01012 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Hunt Construction Group, Inc., re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Compel filed by Defendant Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (Anada, Tarak) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Meghan E. Smith. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDERED that CFS's jury trial demand, (Dkt. #3 ), is WITHDRAWN. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw Demand for Jury Trial by Commercial Flooring System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richie, Sheldon) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Meghan E. Smith ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 100037106) by Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (td) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Commercial Flooring System, Inc., re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION to Compel filed by Defendant Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richie, Sheldon) |
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Meghan E. Smith. (td) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Alternatively for Failure to State a Claim by Hunt Construction Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Subcontract between Hunt and Commercial Flooring, #2 Exhibit B-WDTX Order Dated 9/19/2019, #3 Exhibit C- Subcontract between Hunt and Architectural Concepts)(Anada, Tarak). Added MOTION to Compel Arbitration Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) on 10/24/2019 (td). |
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that CFSs claims against RLI are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Nonsuit Without Prejudice as to Defendant RLI Insurance Company, Only by Commercial Flooring System, Inc. (Richie, Sheldon) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Nonsuit Without Prejudice as to Defendant RFL Insurance Company, Only by Commercial Flooring System, Inc. (Richie, Sheldon) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Commercial Flooring System, Inc.. (Richie, Sheldon) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12736933), filed by Hunt Construction Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1- State Court Record, #4 Exhibit 2- Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3- RLI 10-K)(Anada, Tarak) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
