Henderson v. Davis et al
| Roger Wallace Henderson |
| State of Texas and Lorie Davis |
| 1:2019cv01242 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Andrew W Austin |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections due on or before March 10, 2020. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (td)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #5 Report and Recommendations by Roger Wallace Henderson. (td) |
| Filing 7 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt for #5 Report and Recommendations as to Roger Wallace Henderson. (td) |
| Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt of #5 Report and Recommendations. (td) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Roger Wallace Henderson. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (td) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Roger Wallace Henderson. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (td)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to Roger Wallace Henderson. (cj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roger Wallace Henderson.. Motions referred to Judge Andrew W. Austin. (cj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Roger Wallace Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
