Simins v. Credit Control, LLC
| Stacey L. Simins |
| Credit Control, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01247 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Credit Control, LLC amending #4 Amended Complaint, filed by Stacey L. Simins.(td) |
Filing 10
ORDER MOOTING #6 Motion to Dismiss ; GRANTING #8 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td)
|
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Credit Control, LLC, re #8 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Stacey L. Simins (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walker, Cooper) |
| Filing 8 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Stacey L. Simins. (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Credit Control, LLC. (Malone, Robbie) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) and Memoradum of Law in Support Thereof by Credit Control, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Malone, Robbie) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stacey L. Simins as to Credit Control, LLC. Waiver sent on 12/26/2019, answer due 2/24/2020. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT First against Credit Control, LLC amending, filed by Stacey L. Simins.(Volheim, Nathan) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Stacey L. Simins. (cj) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Stacey L. Simins. Attorney Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis added to party Stacey L. Simins(pty:pla) (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Appearance of Counsel by Stacey L. Simins (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13011481), filed by Stacey L. Simins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Simins v. Credit Control, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacey L. Simins | |
| Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Control, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV |
| Represented By: | Cooper M. Walker |
| Represented By: | Robbie Malone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
