Hallman Industries v. Albert Fouertie
Hallman Industries |
Albert Fouertie doing business as AppliancesConnection.com |
1:2020cv00817 |
August 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion by Arameh Zargham O'Boyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion by Joshua Briones to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Albert Fouertie answer due 10/15/2020. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Juan M. Alcala Arameh Zargham O'Boyle ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13964479) by on behalf of Albert Fouertie. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice)(Alcala, Juan) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Juan M. Alcala Joshua Briones ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13964406) by on behalf of Albert Fouertie. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice)(Alcala, Juan) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Albert Fouertie. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time)(Alcala, Juan) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hallman Industries. Albert Fouertie served on 8/25/2020, answer due 9/15/2020. (Biller, Anthony) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Anthony J. Biller. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (td) |
Filing 6 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office along with a copy of Complaint. (dl) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Albert Fouertie. (dl) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Arthur Gollwitzer, III for Anthony J. Biller ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13825071) by on behalf of Hallman Industries. (Gollwitzer, Arthur) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Hallman Industries. (Gollwitzer, Arthur) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Hallman Industries. (Gollwitzer, Arthur) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13824859), filed by Hallman Industries. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons)(Gollwitzer, Arthur) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (dl) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hallman Industries. (dl) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.