Senko et al v. City of Austin et al
| Jessica Ragsdill, Hannah Senko, Amanda Day and Whitley Degollado |
| City of Austin, Margaret Moore, Brian Manley, Rosemary Lehmberg, Art Acevedo and Travis County, Texas |
| 1:2020cv01047 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion by Elizabeth G. Myers to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (td)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion by Kristen E. Sanocki to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (td)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Stay Case; GRANTING #5 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; GRANTING #7 Motion to Stay Case; GRANTING #8 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (td)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elizabeth G. Myers of Kristen Sanocki ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14117116) by on behalf of Amanda Day, Whitley Degollado, Jessica Ragsdill, Hannah Senko. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Myers, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elizabeth G. Myers ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14117013) by on behalf of Amanda Day, Whitley Degollado, Jessica Ragsdill, Hannah Senko. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Myers, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Amanda Day, Whitley Degollado, Jessica Ragsdill, Hannah Senko, re #7 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case filed by Defendant Margaret Moore, Defendant Travis County, Texas, Defendant Rosemary Lehmberg, #5 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation filed by Defendant Brian Manley, Defendant City of Austin, Defendant Art Acevedo, #8 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation filed by Defendant Margaret Moore, Defendant Travis County, Texas, Defendant Rosemary Lehmberg, #4 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case filed by Defendant Brian Manley, Defendant City of Austin, Defendant Art Acevedo (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ecklund, Jennifer) |
| Notice of Correction: re #5 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation , #8 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation . Effective 7/28/2020. When filing a Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations in the Austin Division, the document that exceeds the page limit should now be attached to the motion, and should no longer be filed as a separate docket event. Your filing will be added to the docket by the Clerks Office, if the Court grants your motion for leave. Please note this information for future filing purposes. (td) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Rosemary Lehmberg, Margaret Moore, Travis County, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dippel, Leslie) |
| Filing 8 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation by Rosemary Lehmberg, Margaret Moore, Travis County, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Travis County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Dippel, Leslie) |
| Filing 7 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case by Rosemary Lehmberg, Margaret Moore, Travis County, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dippel, Leslie) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) by Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Brian Manley. (Schaefer, Sara) |
| Filing 5 Opposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation by Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Brian Manley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schaefer, Sara) |
| Filing 4 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case by Art Acevedo, City of Austin, Brian Manley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schaefer, Sara) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
|
Filing 2
Orders Directing Elizabeth G. Myers and Kristen E. Sanocki to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brian Manley (Austin Police Chief), Art Acevedo (Former Austin Police Chief), Rosemary Lehmberg (Former Travis County District Attorney), Margaret Moore, Travis County, Texas, City Of Austin (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14075356), filed by Brian Manley (Austin Police Chief), Art Acevedo (Former Austin Police Chief), Rosemary Lehmberg (Former Travis County District Attorney), Margaret Moore, Travis County, Texas, City Of Austin. (Attachments: #1 TC Consent, #2 State Filings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schaefer, Sara) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Amanda Day, Whitley Degollado, Jessica Ragsdill, Hannah Senko. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
