Nicholas et al v. Ameris Bank
Gregory Nicholas and Andrea Nicholas |
Ameris Bank |
1:2020cv01054 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively,, MOTION for Summary Judgment by Ameris Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit B)(Moeller, Evan) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ameris Bank amending, filed by Andrea Nicholas, Gregory Nicholas.(cj) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Amend Complaint entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file Plaintiffs' amended complaint at Dkt. 8. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2) |
Text Order MOOTING #7 Motion to Dismiss ; MOOTING #7 Motion for Summary Judgment entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiffs' amended complaint, (Dkt. 8), Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Dkt. 7), pertains to a now-superseded pleading and is thus MOOT. See Good River Farms, LP v. TXI Operations, LP, No. 1:17-CV-1117-RP, 2018 WL 1770494, at *3 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2018); see also King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Andrea Nicholas, Gregory Nicholas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed pleading, #2 Proposed Order Order granting leave to amend)(Sutton, J.) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively,, MOTION for Summary Judgment by Ameris Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5)(Moeller, Evan) |
Ameris Bank answer due 11/16/2020. (cj) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs amended complaint, (Dkt. 5), on or before November 16, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2) |
Filing 6 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Amended Complaint by Ameris Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moeller, Evan) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT Following Removal against Ameris Bank amending, filed by Andrea Nicholas, Gregory Nicholas.(Sutton, J.) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal by Ameris Bank. (Attachments: #1 Supplement State Court Docket)(Moeller, Evan) |
Filing 3 ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj) |
Filing 2 Case Opening Letters mailed to Andrea and Gregory Nicholas. (cj) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ameris Bank (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14082380), filed by Ameris Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Moeller, Evan) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.