Manson v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: James Manson
Respondent: FNU Crowley and TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 1:2020cv01215
Filed: December 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Lane
Referring Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2021 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bobby Lumpkin.(Brodbeck, Lori)
January 13, 2021 Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin answer due 2/11/2021. (dm)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Mark Lane. Respondent's answer is due on or before February 11, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
January 12, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (Brodbeck, Lori)
January 12, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lori Brodbeck on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin. Attorney Lori Brodbeck added to party Bobby Lumpkin(pty:res) (Brodbeck, Lori)
January 11, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by James Manson addressed to Bobby Lumpkin. (cc3)
January 11, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by James Manson (cc3)
December 15, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by James Manson (cc3)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Respondent to Answer Petition. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (dm)
December 14, 2020 Filing 5 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 100039386 (cc3)
December 14, 2020 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter mailed to James Manson. (dl)
December 11, 2020 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 100039386), filed by James Manson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope and Receipt)(dl)
December 11, 2020 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)
December 11, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (dl)
December 11, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manson v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU Crowley
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Lori Brodbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Manson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?