Tarver v. Webb et al
| Norman Ray Tarver and Norman R. Tarver |
| Apple Bus Company - Home Office, Apple Bus Company, Diane C. Webb, Kourtney Logue, John McGuirk, Elaine Davidson, Tasha Woods, Gloria Johnson, Stephanie Teters Shaw and Richard Poterson |
| 1:2020cv01232 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple Bus Company, Apple Bus Company - Home Office, Diane C. Webb, Richard Poterson, Elaine Davidson, Tasha Woods, Kourtney Logue, John McGuirk, Gloria Johnson, Stephanie Teters Shaw amending, filed by Norman R. Tarver.(lt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Norman Ray Tarver. (dl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Norman Ray Tarver. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Cover Letter), #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (dl). |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane.. Referral Judge: Mark Lane. (dl) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
