Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A. v. Haas Outdoors, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A.
Defendant: Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Petitioner: QuestionPro, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020mc00813
Filed: August 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING QuestionPro, Inc. and Haas Outdoors, Inc.'s #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Signed by Judge Susan Hightower. (lt)
August 13, 2020 Motions No Longer Referred: #1 MOTION to Quash. (lt)
August 11, 2020 Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Haas Outdoors, Inc., QuestionPro, Inc., re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Movant QuestionPro, Inc., Movant Haas Outdoors, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C - Amended and Shortened Motion to Quash, #2 Exhibit D - Declaration of W. Whitaker Rayner with Exhibits 1-2 Attached, #3 Exhibit E - Declaration of Andrew S. Harris with Exhibits 3-4 Attached, #4 Proposed Order)(Harris, Andrew)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Susan Hightower. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ssw)
August 10, 2020 Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A., re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Movant QuestionPro, Inc., Movant Haas Outdoors, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5, #2 Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order)(Jones, Joshua)
August 10, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua G. Jones for John A. Galbreath ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13847202) by on behalf of Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A.. (Jones, Joshua)
August 10, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joshua G. Jones on behalf of Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A. (Jones, Joshua)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING MOTION for resolution: #1 MOTION to Quash filed by QuestionPro, Inc., Haas Outdoors, Inc. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. Referral Magistrate Judge: Susan Hightower. (lt)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Walter Whitaker Rayner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Haas Outdoors, Inc./QuestionPro,Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Andrew Scott Harris to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Haas Outdoors, Inc./QuestionPro, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
August 4, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Krystal Pfluger Scott for Whit Rayner ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13826781) by on behalf of Haas Outdoors, Inc., QuestionPro, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Rayner Pro Hac Motion)(Scott, Krystal)
August 4, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Krystal Pfluger Scott for Andrew S. Harris ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-13826647) by on behalf of Haas Outdoors, Inc., QuestionPro, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Harris Pro Hac Motion)(Scott, Krystal)
August 3, 2020 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj)
August 3, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash ($47.00 Filing Fee #100038846) by Haas Outdoors, Inc., QuestionPro, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, Cover Letter, Receipt, and Envelope)(cj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A. v. Haas Outdoors, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audemars Piguet Holdings, S.A.
Represented By: Joshua G. Jones
Represented By: John A. Galbreath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: QuestionPro, Inc.
Represented By: Krystal Pfluger Scott
Represented By: Andrew Scott Harris
Represented By: Walter Whitaker Rayner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Scott Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?