Smith v. Paige
| Kendall Lamonte Smith |
| A. Paige |
| 1:2021cv00043 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter/Correspondence from Kendall Lamonte Smith requesting videos and paperwork from incident #20202221314. (jv2) |
Text Order DENYING #8 Motion for Reconsideration entered by Judge Mark Lane. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reconsideration re Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel by Kendall Lamonte Smith. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (jv2) |
| Filing 7 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Kendall Lamonte Smith. (jv2) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER STAYING CASE pending resolution of Cause No. D-1-DC-20204982 in the 403rd Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff shall file a status report every 60 days. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (jv2)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Kendall Lamonte Smith, TDCJ #2016230. Initial Partial filing fee of ($0.00) assessed. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons nor forward summons to the United States Marshal for service on defendants unless and until directed by further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (jv2)
|
|
Text Order DENYING #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel entered by Judge Mark Lane. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Filing 4 Case Opening Letter mailed to Kendall Lamonte Smith. (dl) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kendall Lamonte Smith. (dl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kendall Lamonte Smith. (dl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Kendall Lamonte Smith. Attachment #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Envelope (dl). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane.. Referral Judge: Mark Lane. (dl) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Paige | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kendall Lamonte Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: A. Paige | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
