McNamara v. Your Fare, Inc. et al
| Meghan McNamara |
| Your Fare, Inc. and Christopher Monk |
| 1:2021cv00140 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties by Your Fare, Inc.. (Duke, John) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney John Earl Duke added to party Christopher Monk(pty:dft), Attorney John Earl Duke added to party Your Fare, Inc.(pty:dft) by Christopher Monk, Your Fare, Inc..(Duke, John) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Christopher Monk, Your Fare, Inc.. (cj) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Meghan McNamara. (Smith, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14474115), filed by Meghan McNamara. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Edward) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Meghan McNamara. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
