Phillips v. City of Austin, TX et al
| Amanda Kaye Phillips |
| City of Austin, TX, Julie Tower, Ascension, Austin Community College District, Robert Fischer, University of Texas at Austin, Jackson Lewis, PC, Dell Medical School, Seton Ascension, Elizabeth Freedleberg, Carolyn Cummings, Deb Brown, Christopher Born and Texas Board of Nursing |
| 1:2021cv00173 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint by Amanda Kaye Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 USM-285 Form, #4 IFP)(cj) |
Text Order DENYING #1 Motion for Leave to File entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Phillips's complaint fails to allege a non-frivolous claim. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
