Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
| Bill Lietzke |
| City of Montgomery and Steven Reed |
| 1:2021cv00195 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Andrew W Austin |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED that the above-captioned cases are TRANSFERRED to the Northern Division of the Middle District of Alabama. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dm)
|
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin. (dm) |
| Filing 4 Case Opening Letter mailed to Bill Lietzke. (cj) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons by Bill Lietzke (cj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bill Lietzke.. Motions referred to Judge Andrew W. Austin. (cj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Bill Lietzke. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin. (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
