Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership v. Hall et al
Plaintiff: Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership
Defendant: Gregory Hall and Lookout Ridge, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv00199
Filed: March 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Emily Shanks. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cc3)
March 16, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Thomas Charles Scannell Emily Shanks Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14597457) by on behalf of Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Scannell, Thomas)
March 8, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Reissued as to Gregory Hall and Lookout Ridge, LLC. (cc3)
March 8, 2021 Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership. (Scannell, Thomas)
March 8, 2021 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants amending #1 Complaint., filed by Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scannell, Thomas)
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership and Lookout Ridge LLC (cc3)
March 4, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership. (Scannell, Thomas)
March 3, 2021 Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter mailed to Emily Shanks regarding non-admitted status. (dl)
March 2, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)
March 2, 2021 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl)
March 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14545679), filed by Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scannell, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership v. Hall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lookout Ridge, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Romspen Mortgage Limited Partnership
Represented By: Thomas Charles Scannell
Represented By: Emily Shanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?