Jones v. MRS BPO, LLC
| Katherine Jones |
| MRS BPO, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00219 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert Pitman: Pretrial Conference held on 4/28/2021 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically)(Court Reporter Lily I. Reznik.)(cc3) |
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Consent to Trial by Magistrate due by 4/27/2021, Jury Trial set for 5/9/2022 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman, ADR Report Deadline due by 5/11/2021, Amended Pleadings due by 6/8/2021, Discovery due by 9/14/2021, Joinder of Parties due by 6/8/2021, Motions due by 9/28/2021.. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 11 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by MRS BPO, LLC. (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Katherine Jones. (Hickle, Tyler) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Setting Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference for 4/28/2021 09:20 AM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (bot1)
|
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Katherine Jones. (Hickle, Tyler) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MRS BPO, LLC. (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by MRS BPO, LLC.(Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael S. Poncin on behalf of MRS BPO, LLC. Attorney Michael S. Poncin added to party MRS BPO, LLC(pty:dft) (Poncin, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Katherine Jones. MRS BPO, LLC served on 3/12/2021, answer due 4/2/2021. (Hickle, Tyler) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MRS BPO, LLC. (cc3) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Katherine Jones. (Hickle, Tyler) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14570409). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Katherine Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hickle, Tyler) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Katherine Jones. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. MRS BPO, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Katherine Jones | |
| Represented By: | Tyler Hickle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MRS BPO, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael S. Poncin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
