Leal v. Doe #1 et al
Tomas Leal |
John Doe #1 and Byron Trucking, Inc. |
1:2021cv00225 |
March 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Byron Trucking, Inc..(Ramey, Robert) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj) |
Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Byron Trucking, Inc.. (Ramey, Robert) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, [1-4] Civil Cover Sheet Supplement by Byron Trucking, Inc.. (Ramey, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Byron Trucking, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14575322), filed by Byron Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Docs, #2 Index of Documents Filed, #3 List of Parties/Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, Robert) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Byron Trucking, Inc., Tomas Leal. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.