Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company
| Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company |
| The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv00329 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER setting Initial Pretrial Conference for 6/24/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 9 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company. (McCoy, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order Agreed Scheduling Order by Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company. (Stendell, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE Concerning Reference to United States Magistrate Judge by Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company re To be Referred to SA Mag Judge (Stendell, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Aaron George Stendell on behalf of Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (Stendell, Aaron) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company. (McCoy, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing State Court Pleadings by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings)(McCoy, Michael) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the removing party to supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dl)
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to Civil Cover Sheet by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company. (McCoy, Michael) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (dl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14699126), filed by The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit Declaration, #3 Appendix List of Items Filed, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal - State, #5 Exhibit Notice of Removal - Plaintiff, #6 Exhibit List of Parties and Counsel, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(McCoy, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael W. McCoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Aaron George Stendell |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Shehane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
