Rowe v. AISD Ted Cruz
Marcus Lee Rowe |
AISD Ted Cruz |
1:2021cv00342 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Mark Lane |
Lee Yeakel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2) |
Filing 5 Case Opening Letter mailed to Marcus Lee Rowe. (dl) |
Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from Eastern District of Texas; Case Number 5:20-cv-00134. |
Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (dl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
Interdistrict transfer to the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. (slo, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER. It is ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. (Held for 20 days pursuant to Local Rule 83.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 3/30/2021. (slo, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING PRISONER CASE to Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 08/10/20. (lfs, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AISD Ted Cruz filed by Marcus Lee Rowe. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(lfs, ) (No IFP Motion or filing fee) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
Sent prose guidelines including instructions to inform Court of address changes per Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 4/19/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rowe v. AISD Ted Cruz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AISD Ted Cruz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marcus Lee Rowe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.