Matthews v. Pilgrim
Delano Matthews |
Rayne Pilgrim |
1:2021cv00343 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Chris Jackson by Delano Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Swords, Sean) |
![]() |
Notice of Correction: re #10 Defendant Rayne Pilgrim's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. This document was incorrectly filed using the Motion event. The docket clerk has modified the docket entry to terminate the motion event and correct the docket text. ***PLEASE TAKE NOTE for future filings*** Pursuant to FRCP Rule 5(d)(1), initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) or (2) and discovery requests or responses should not be filed unless on specific order of the court, or when they are in support of a motion or for use in trial and then attached to the appropriate filing. (jv2) |
Filing 10 Defendant Rayne Pilgrim's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures by Rayne Pilgrim. (Ellis, Joseph) Modified on 5/17/2021 (jv2). |
Filing 9 MOTION to Substitute Attorney Luke Dow and Sean Swords by Delano Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Swords, Sean) |
Filing 8 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #7 Notice (Other) (jv2) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal and Appearance of New Counsel of Record by Delano Matthews (Swords, Sean) |
Filing 6
ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Rayne Pilgrim Regarding Supplement to #1 |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J. Luke Dow on behalf of Delano Matthews. Attorney J. Luke Dow added to party Delano Matthews(pty:pla) (Dow, J.) |
Filing 4 Original ANSWER to Complaint by Rayne Pilgrim.(Ellis, Joseph) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Rayne Pilgrim (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14710706), filed by Rayne Pilgrim. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Supplement to JS 44, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Ellis, Joseph) (Attachment 2 replaced and flattened on 4/19/2021) (cj). |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Delano Matthews, Rayne Pilgrim. (cj) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Matthews v. Pilgrim | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rayne Pilgrim | |
Represented By: | Joseph S. Ellis |
Represented By: | Jose J. Trevino, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Delano Matthews | |
Represented By: | Chris Jackson |
Represented By: | Anselmo Aguirre |
Represented By: | J. Luke Dow |
Represented By: | Sean Burton Swords |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.