Nembhard v. Williamson County, Texas et al
Imani Nembhard |
Robert Chody, Williamson County, Texas and Christopher Pisa |
1:2021cv00350 |
April 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Text Order GRANTING #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall respond to the motion to dismiss on or before July 10, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Imani Nembhard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Roberts, James) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Blair J. Leake added to party Christopher Pisa(pty:dft) by Christopher Pisa.(Leake, Blair) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Williamson County, Texas. (Zinnecker, Ben) |
Text Order GRANTING #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Pisa shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before May 27, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Christopher Pisa. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Leake, Blair) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Williamson County shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before May 27, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Williamson County, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zinnecker, Ben) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Imani Nembhard as to Robert Chody. Waiver sent on 4/28/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Roberts, James) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Imani Nembhard. Christopher Pisa served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021; Williamson County, Texas served on 4/22/2021, answer due 5/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)(Roberts, James) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Robert Chody, Christopher Pisa, Williamson County, Texas. (cj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Painter Roberts on behalf of Imani Nembhard. Attorney James Painter Roberts added to party Imani Nembhard(pty:pla) (Roberts, James) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Imani Nembhard. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon)(Palmer, Scott) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Imani Nembhard. (Palmer, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14721114), filed by Imani Nembhard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Palmer, Scott) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Imani Nembhard. (cj) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.