EnergyBill.com, L.L.C. et al v. Arcadis U.S., Inc.
| EnergyBill.com, L.L.C. and Michael Andrew Davis, II |
| Arcadis U.S., Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00426 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by EnergyBill.com, L.L.C., Michael Andrew Davis, II as to Arcadis U.S., Inc.. Waiver sent on 5/20/2021, answer due 7/19/2021. (Welch, Justin) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Michael Andrew Davis, II, EnergyBill.com, L.L.C.. (Welch, Justin) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/14/2021 to flatten image) (dl). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14805913), filed by EnergyBill.com, L.L.C., Michael Andrew Davis, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Welch, Justin) (Attachment 4 replaced on 5/14/2021 to flatten image) (dl). |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
