Durrette v. Department of Treasury et al
Plaintiff: James Allen Durrette
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Case Number: 1:2021cv00618
Filed: July 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Lane
Referring Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2021 Filing 10 Copy of #9 Report and Recommendation sent via certified mail, as to James Allen Durrette. (lt)
August 25, 2021 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the United States Magistrate Judge re #1 Complaint filed by James Allen Durrette. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting #6 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of James Allen Durrette (Ohio #752-372). ORDER that James Allen Durrette (Ohio #752-372) is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $74.88. ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons nor forward summons to the United States Marshal for service on defendants unless and until directed by further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER VACATING Order of Dismissal (at Dkt. #5 ) and REOPENING case. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
August 24, 2021 Copy of Order #8 sent via first class mail to Mansfield Correctional Institution, Attention Finance, 1150 North Main Street, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, OH 44901. (lt)
August 20, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Allen Durrette. (lt)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution and for failure to obey an order of the court. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must submit on or before August 13, 2021, the completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the $402.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP)(lt)
July 13, 2021 Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to James Allen Durrette. (cj)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
July 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 402 is DUE.), filed by James Allen Durrette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj)
July 12, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Durrette v. Department of Treasury et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Allen Durrette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?