Melendez v. San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
| Elizabeth Melendez |
| San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center |
| 1:2021cv00718 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Dustin M Howell |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Elizabeth Melendez, re #4 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel filed by Defendant San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center (Attachments: #1 Employee Statement, #2 X Ray Images)(lt) |
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING all pending and future discovery motions as well as all other nondispositive motions to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell for r esolution. ORDER REFERRING all pending and future dispositive motions to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell for Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. Referral Magistrate Judge: Dustin M. Howell. (lt)
|
| Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center identifying Corporate Parent Guadalupe County Hospital Board for San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. (Drake, Jo Beth) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or in the alternative, MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Drake, Jo Beth). Added MOTION to Compel on 9/28/2021 and modified text (klw). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing USPS confirmation that the defendant received the lawsuit on September 8, 2021 by Elizabeth Melendez (lt) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. (lt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 100040272), filed by Elizabeth Melendez. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10, #11 Attachment 11, #12 Civil Cover Sheet and Receipt)(cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Melendez v. San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Melendez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | |
| Represented By: | Jo Beth Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
