Sloan v. Feldman et al
| Scott Sloan |
| Jennifer Feldman and John Does |
| 1:2021cv00724 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Magistrate Docket 4 - Austin |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING Pro Se Plaintiff's #15 Motion for Extension of Time. Sloan may file objections to the report and recommendation signed by the United States Magistrate Judge #10 on or before October 21, 2021. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Document by Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 14 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt for re #10 Report and Recommendations as to Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 13 Clerk's Office RESPONSE to #12 Letter/Correspondence by Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 12 Letter/Correspondence from Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 11 Copy of #10 Report and Recommendation sent via certified mail and first class mail, as to Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the United States Magistrate Judge re #1 Complaint filed by Scott Sloan. Signed by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (lt) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Granting #8 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Scott Sloan, Hays Co. No. 896395. Scott Sloan is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $10.00. ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons nor forward summons to the United States Marshal for service on defendants unless and until directed by further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (lt)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Scott Sloan.. Motions referred to Judge Dustin M. Howell. (lt) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Scott Sloan. (lt) |
|
Text Order DISMISSING #5 Motion for Discovery entered by Judge Dustin M. Howell. Plaintiff's motion is premature in that he has not yet paid the filing fee for this case or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis as ordered by the Court. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
|
| Filing 6 Request for Issuance of Summons by Scott Sloan. (lt) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Discovery by Scott Sloan.. Motions referred to Judge Dustin M. Howell. (lt) |
|
Filing 4
DEFICIENCY ORDER: the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis and that Plaintiff, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, must submiteither the filing fee of $402.00 or must submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP)(lt)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to Scott Sloan. (cj) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 BIVENS COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 402 is DUE.), filed by Scott Sloan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, Cover Letter, and Envelope)(cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
