Hooks v. Obama et al
| Arthur Hooks |
| Barack Hussein Obama and Mitchell Landry |
| 1:2021cv00827 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #5 Order for More Definite Statement by Arthur Hooks. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(lt) |
| Filing 6 Copy of #5 Order for More Definite Statement sent via first-class mail and certified mail, as to Arthur Hooks. (lt) |
Filing 5
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Statement due 10/4/21. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (lt)
|
| Filing 4 Case Opening Letter mailed to Arthur Hooks. (cj) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arthur Hooks.. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Arthur Hooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope)(cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Arthur Hooks. (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
