Favila v. Three Way Logistics, Inc.
| David Favila |
| Three Way Logistics, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00847 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order Agreed by David Favila. (Bafidis-Rodriguez, Alfonso) |
| Filing 7 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan Agreed by David Favila. (Bafidis-Rodriguez, Alfonso) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Alfonso Bafidis-Rodriguez to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David Favila. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (lt)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Alfonso Bafidis-Rodriguez ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15274171) by on behalf of David Favila. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vasconcelos, Guilherme) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2021: #2 Sealed Document ATTACHMENT) (so). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the removing party supplement the record with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Directing Douglas T. Gosda to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cj)
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal by Three Way Logistics, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, , filed by Three Way Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Schlak, Gregory) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (cj) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Three Way Logistics, Inc.. (cj) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Three Way Logistics, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15258876), filed by Three Way Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit A4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit A5)(Schlak, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Favila v. Three Way Logistics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Favila | |
| Represented By: | Alfonso Bafidis-Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Guilherme Vasconcelos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Three Way Logistics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory A. Schlak |
| Represented By: | Douglas T. Gosda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
