Moats v National Credit Union Administration Board
Jeffrey Moats |
National Credit Union Administration Board |
1:2021cv00881 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Personal Property: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 3114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER re #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Jeffrey Moats. As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jeffrey Moats (MacVane, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Case by Jeffrey Moats (MacVane, John) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to National Credit Union Administration Board. (jv2) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Jeffrey Moats. (MacVane, John) |
Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 7:21-cv-00377. |
Filing 3 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Western District of Texas (Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/1/2021.] |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
Interdistrict transfer to Western District of Texas. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 10/01/21, filed. (klopez, 7) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/1/2021.] |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/16/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Micaela Alvarez (by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(klopez, 7) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/1/2021.] |
Filing 1 Petitioner's Motion to Return Property Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) and Equitable Authority/Other Miscellaneous Relief ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number 0541-27121510.) filed by Jeffrey Moats. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Declaration of Jeffrey Moats, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Proposed Order)(Kernell, Terry) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/1/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moats v National Credit Union Administration Board | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Moats | |
Represented By: | Russell Hardin, Jr. |
Represented By: | John MacVane |
Represented By: | Victoria Ann Reilly |
Represented By: | Terry Dean Kernell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Credit Union Administration Board | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.