Jones v. State of Texas et al
| William Curtis Jones |
| State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles |
| 1:2021cv00898 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Susan Hightower |
| Robert Pitman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from TXWD has been received and opened in Texas Eastern District as case number 1:21-cv-00514, filed 10/13/2021. (lt) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING this case to the Beaumont Division of the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter mailed to William Curtis Jones. (cj) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cj)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 is DUE.), filed by William Curtis Jones. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, Cover Letter, and Envelope)(cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
