De La O' v. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC
Marcos De La O' |
Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC |
1:2021cv00952 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines: Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC answer due 12/31/2021. (jv2) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Crescent Hotels & Resorts shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before December 31, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jalc) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint to file Response Pleading by Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kotlarsky, Shane) |
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before December 11, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jalc) |
Reset Deadlines: Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC answer due 12/11/2021. (jv2) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marcos De La O'. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC served on 10/22/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. (Melton, John) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kotlarsky, Shane) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC. (cj) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Marcos De La O'. (Melton, John) (Main Document 2 replaced and flattened on 10/21/2021) (cj). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15360804), filed by Marcos De La O'. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Melton, John) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Marcos De La O'. (cj) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: De La O' v. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marcos De La O' | |
Represented By: | Michael Balcezak |
Represented By: | John F. Melton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC | |
Represented By: | Shane L. Kotlarsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.