Penta, Jr. v. Cenlar Capital Corporation
Robert E. Penta, Jr. |
Cenlar Capital Corporation |
1:2021cv01019 |
November 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Dustin M Howell |
Lee Yeakel |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua A. Eames-Cepero for Brian H. Buster Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cc3) |
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Dustin M. Howell. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ddd) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua A. Eames-Cepero for Brian H. Buster ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15484395) by on behalf of Robert E. Penta, Jr... Motions referred to Judge Dustin M. Howell. (Eames-Cepero, Joshua) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Cenlar Capital Corporation.(Hopkins, Shelley) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties and Disclosure Statement by Cenlar Capital Corporation. (Hopkins, Shelley) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Cenlar Capital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hopkins, Shelley) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cc3) |
Filing 3 Order Directing Brian Henry Buster to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dl) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing the removing party to supplement the removal with state court pleadings, if it has not already done so. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dl) |
Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (dl) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cenlar Capital Corporation (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15432045), filed by Cenlar Capital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet)(Hopkins, Shelley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Penta, Jr. v. Cenlar Capital Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert E. Penta, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Brian Henry Buster |
Represented By: | Joshua A. Eames-Cepero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cenlar Capital Corporation | |
Represented By: | Shelley L. Hopkins |
Represented By: | Robert Davis Forster, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.