Carder et al v. Rogue Erectors, LLC
| Joseph Carder, Travis Wallace and Robert Henry |
| Rogue Erectors, LLC |
| 1:2021cv01091 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Mark Lane |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Originally referred in error. (jv2) |
| Filing 4 ATTACHMENT of CORRECTIVE DOCUMENTS to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment by Joseph Carder, Robert Henry, Travis Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Writ of Garnishment)(Herrin, Grant) |
| Filing 3 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Joseph Carder, Robert Henry, Travis Wallace. (Herrin, Grant) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dl)
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 100040569), filed by Joseph Carder, Travis Wallace, Robert Henry. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Receipt, #4 Proposed Order) (dl). |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
