Gomez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Plaintiff: Evelyn Gomez
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv01127
Filed: December 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan Joint by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (Payne, Brett)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order Agreed by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (Payne, Brett) Modified on 2/2/2022 (lt).
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AGREED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (lt)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Agreed MOTION for Entry of Confidentiality and Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (Payne, Brett)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by David Schupp entered by Judge Robert Pitman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jg)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shawn Michelle Frazier on behalf of Evelyn Gomez (Frazier, Shawn)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Evelyn Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Withdrawal of Attorney)(Frazier, Shawn)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dl)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order Directing David Schupp to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dl)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15523232), filed by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Payne, Brett)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Evelyn Gomez, Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. (dl)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (dl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Gomez
Represented By: David Schupp
Represented By: Shawn Michelle Frazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Represented By: Brett Hermes Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?