Graham v. Conrad
| Sarah Graham |
| Alan Jerome Conrad |
| 1:2021cv01164 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Alan Jerome Conrad. (Applewhite, Rebecca) |
Filing 9
ORDER, (Pretrial Conference set for 2/23/2022 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman). Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (bot2)
|
| Filing 8 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Sarah Graham. (Blackburn, Mark) |
| Filing 7 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order Agreed by Sarah Graham. (Blackburn, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan Joint by Sarah Graham. (Blackburn, Mark) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Sarah Graham. Attorney Rebecca Ashley Applewhite added to party Alan Jerome Conrad(pty:dft) by Alan Jerome Conrad.(Applewhite, Rebecca) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Graham. All Defendants. (Blackburn, Mark) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Alan Jerome Conrad. (lt) |
| Notice of Correction: re #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. This filing includes a fillable form. Fillable Forms must be flattened to permanently affix any signatures, or other items added to the document to include the case style, party names, dates, etc. This step should be performed prior to filing your documents through CM/ECF. Instructions are on the Court's website on the CM/ECF page under Training, "Printing to PDF." The Clerk's Office has flattened this form. No further action required. Please take note for future filing purposes (lt) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lt) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (lt) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sarah Graham. (Blackburn, Mark) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/27/2021 to flatten form) (lt). Modified on 12/27/2021 (lt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15558842), filed by Sarah Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Blackburn, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graham v. Conrad | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarah Graham | |
| Represented By: | Mark Bradley Blackburn |
| Represented By: | Blake C. Erskine, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Jeff Work |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Alan Jerome Conrad | |
| Represented By: | J. Hampton Skelton |
| Represented By: | Katherine M. Wyatt |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Ashley Applewhite |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
