Appel et al v. Concierge Auctions, LLC et al
| David Cohen |
| Katie McMains, Serena Irwin, Olivia Asavei, Alexander Gray, Frank Martorano, Emily Pryor and Frank Trunzo |
| Chad Roffers and Concierge Auctions, LLC |
| Howard Appel |
| Deborah L. Trette, Whispering Tides LTD and Robert D. Trette |
| 1:2021cv00522 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order REFERRING #8 Motion for Attorney Fees entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees, (Dkt. 8), is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Mark Lane for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2)
|
| MOTION REFERRED: referred #8 MOTION for Attorney Fees . Referral Judge: Mark Lane. (lt) |
| Filing 12 Transcript filed of Proceedings held on July 7, 2021, Proceedings Transcribed: Motion Hearing. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Lily I. Reznik, Telephone number: 512-391-8792. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript to ensure compliance with the FRCP 5.2(a)/FRCrP 49.1(a). A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Notice of Redaction Request must be filed within 21 days. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 9/10/2021, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/20/2021, Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/18/2021, (lr) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Howard Appel, re #8 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff Howard Appel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Luong, Thanh-Thuy) |
| Filing 10 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Concierge Auctions, LLC, Chad Roffers, re #8 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff Howard Appel (DePonte, Michael) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED Concierge and Roffers shall respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Costs and Attorney's Fees on or before August 10, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Concierge Auctions, LLC, Chad Roffers. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DePonte, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Howard Appel. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Steven Brower, #2 Supplement Log of Expenses In Support of Motion, #3 Proposed Order)(Brower, Steven) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that this action is closed. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING Non-Parties Concierge Auctions LLC and Chad Roffers' #1 Motion to Quash and Request for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (jv2)
|
| Filing 5 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Mark Lane: Motion Hearing held on 7/7/2021 re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Concierge Auctions, LLC, Chad Roffers. Motion taken under advisement. Order forthcoming. (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.) (Court Reporter Lily Reznik.)(jv2) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Setting In-Person Hearing on Non-Parties Concierge Auctions LLC and Chad Roffers' #1 MOTION to Quash and Request for Protective Order: Hearing set for 7/7/2021 at 01:30 PM in Austin before Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (jv2)
|
| MOTION REFERRED: referred #1 MOTION to Quash. Referral Judge: Mark Lane. (jv2) |
|
Text Order REFERRING #1 Motion to Quash entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Quash, (Dkt. 1), is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Mark Lane for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (aa2)
|
| Filing 3 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Howard Appel, re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Movant Concierge Auctions, LLC, Movant Chad Roffers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Proposed Order)(Luong, Thanh-Thuy) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thanh-Thuy Thi Luong on behalf of Howard Appel. Attorney Thanh-Thuy Thi Luong added to party Howard Appel(pty:pla) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Luong, Thanh-Thuy) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash and Request for Protective Order($49.00 Filing Fee Receipt # 100040069) by Concierge Auctions, LLC, Chad Roffers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Cover Letter, Receipt, and Envelope, #4 Proposed Order)(cj) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (cj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
