Stross v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
| Alexander Bayonne Stross |
| Amazon.Com, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00186 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Klaus H. Hamm. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dm)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by James E. Geringer ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15945545) by on behalf of Amazon.Com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Geringer, James) |
| Filing 9 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amazon.Com, Inc.. (Geringer, James) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand . Attorney James E. Geringer added to party Amazon.Com, Inc.(pty:dft) by Amazon.Com, Inc..(Geringer, James) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alexander Bayonne Stross. Amazon.Com, Inc. served on 3/30/2022, answer due 4/20/2022. (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Amazon.Com, Inc.. (dl) |
| Filing 5 Report on Copyright sent to Register of Copyrights along with copy of Complaint. (dl) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Alexander Bayonne Stross. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (dl) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright by Alexander Bayonne Stross re #1 Complaint, (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Wirth, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement - Injunctive Relief Demanded ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15762086), filed by Alexander Bayonne Stross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Works, #2 Exhibit 2 - Registration, #3 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #4 Exhibit 4 - Demand Letters, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wirth, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stross v. Amazon.Com, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Bayonne Stross | |
| Represented By: | Craig Anthony Wirth |
| Represented By: | Joel Benjamin Rothman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.Com, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James E. Geringer |
| Represented By: | Klaus H. Hamm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
