Texas Mutual Insurance Company v. On Demand Staffing, Inc.
| Texas Mutual Insurance Company |
| On Demand Staffing, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00342 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 10 Texas Mutual Insurance Company's ANSWER to Complaint Defendant's Counterclaim. Attorney R. Scott Placek added to party Texas Mutual Insurance Company(pty:pla) by Texas Mutual Insurance Company.(Placek, R.) Modified on 5/6/2022 to create docket entry relationship (jv2). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Texas Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Placek, R.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 Brooke A. Willard's Second Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Defendant. (The Court previously granted Ms. Williard's first motion to appear pro hac vice on 04/13/2022. See Order Dkt. #5) Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Brooke A. Willard by on behalf of On Demand Staffing, Inc. (Filing Fee Paid when first motion to appear pro hac vice was filed - see Dkt. #4) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(jv2) |
| Filing 6 COUNTERCLAIM against Texas Mutual Insurance Company, filed by On Demand Staffing, Inc..(Fiddler, G.) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #4 Brooke A. Willard's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for On Demand Staffing, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (jv2)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by G. Scott Fiddler for Brooke Willard ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15914421) by on behalf of On Demand Staffing, Inc.. (Fiddler, G.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dl)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Directing John Lajzer and Brooke A. Willard to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (Attachments: #1 PHV Order for Brooke A. Willard)(dl)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (dl) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by On Demand Staffing, Inc.. (dl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by On Demand Staffing, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15900902), filed by On Demand Staffing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1 Texas Mutual Petition, #3 Exhibit A-2 Return of Service, #4 Exhibit A-3 ODS Answer, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement Supplement to JS 44 Cover Sheet)(Fiddler, G.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
