Lynch et al v. Tesla, Inc.
| John Lynch, Daxton Hartsfield and Shawn Sakhizada |
| Tesla, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00597 |
| June 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. § 2102 WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada, re #28 MOTION to Dismiss AND COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION UNDER RULES 12(B)(1) AND 12(B)(3) filed by Defendant Tesla, Inc. (Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #29 Motion for Leave to File entered by Judge Susan Hightower. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ssw)
|
|
Text Order MOOTING #13 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, (Dkt. 26), this motion is MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mplc)
|
|
Text Order REFERRING #28 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(d) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mplc)
|
|
Filing 30
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Cullen Wallace on behalf of Tesla, Inc. (Wallace, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION for Leave to File SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wallace, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 28
MOTION to Dismiss AND COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION UNDER RULES 12(B)(1) AND 12(B)(3) by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Wallace, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 27
PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF re #7 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by John Lynch, Daxton Hartsfield (Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 26
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tesla, Inc. filed by John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada, and Daxton Hartsfield.(Herrmann, Drew) Modified on 7/27/2022 docket text entry (pg).
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shannon Liss-Riordan on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada (Liss-Riordan, Shannon)
|
|
Filing 24
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Harold Lichten on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada (Lichten, Harold)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Patton on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada. Attorney Matthew Patton added to party Shawn Sakhizada(pty:pla) (Patton, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Fowler on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada. Attorney Thomas Fowler added to party Shawn Sakhizada(pty:pla) (Fowler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Zachary Rubin on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch, Shawn Sakhizada. Attorney Zachary Rubin added to party Shawn Sakhizada(pty:pla) (Rubin, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 20
Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Tesla, Inc., re #7 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff John Lynch, Plaintiff Daxton Hartsfield (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration in Support)(Sheeder, Robert)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Matthew Patton for Daxton Hartsfield,Matthew Patton for John Lynch. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan for Daxton Hartsfield,Shannon Liss-Riordan for John Lynch. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Thomas Fowler for Daxton Hartsfield,Thomas Fowler for John Lynch. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Zachary Rubin for Daxton Hartsfield,Zachary Rubin for John Lynch. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Harold Lichten for Daxton Hartsfield,Harold Lichten for John Lynch. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
MOTION REFERRED: referred #13 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Individual Arbitration. Referral Judge: Susan Hightower. (pg)
|
|
Text Order REFERRING #13 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(d) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mplc)
|
|
Filing 14
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Tesla, Inc.. (Sheeder, Robert)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Individual Arbitration by Tesla, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration in Support)(Sheeder, Robert)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Drew N. Herrmann for Zachary Rubin ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16224767) by on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Drew N. Herrmann for Thomas Fowler ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16224739) by on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Drew N. Herrmann for Shannon Liss-Riordan ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16224722) by on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Drew N. Herrmann for Matthew Patton ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16224699) by on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Drew N. Herrmann for Harold Lichten ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16224594) by on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
MOTION REFERRED: referred #7 MOTION for Protective Order . Referral Judge: Susan Hightower. (pg)
|
|
Text Order REFERRING #7 Motion for Protective Order entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, (Dkt. 7), is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mplc)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Protective Order by Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Proposed Order)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Service Photo)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Tesla, Inc.. (pg)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons In A Civil Action to Tesla, Inc.)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Allison Hope Luttrell on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. Attorney Allison Hope Luttrell added to party Daxton Hartsfield(pty:pla), Attorney Allison Hope Luttrell added to party John Lynch(pty:pla) (Luttrell, Allison)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Pamela G. Herrmann on behalf of Daxton Hartsfield, John Lynch. Attorney Pamela G. Herrmann added to party Daxton Hartsfield(pty:pla), Attorney Pamela G. Herrmann added to party John Lynch(pty:pla) (Herrmann, Pamela)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-16160048), filed by John Lynch, Daxton Hartsfield. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herrmann, Drew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
