Cargill et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al
| Michael Cargill and CTC HGC, LLC |
| Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2022cv01063 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 923 - Review of Firearms Licensing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (rn) |
| Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter mailed to Nate Curtisi and Nicholas Barry (rn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (rn) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by CTC HGC, LLC, Michael Cargill. (Miller, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16652343), filed by Michael Cargill, CTC HGC, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
