TurboCode LLC v. ZyXEL Communications Corporation
| TurboCode LLC |
| ZyXEL Communications Corporation |
| 1:2022cv01162 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TurboCode LLC as to ZyXEL Communications Corporation. Waiver sent on 12/12/2022, answer due 3/13/2023. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael Damian French for TurboCode LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (pg)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher V. Goodpastor on behalf of TurboCode LLC (Goodpastor, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew G. DiNovo for Michael D. French ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-16747482) by on behalf of TurboCode LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DiNovo, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to ZyXEL Communications Corporation. (cr5) |
| Filing 5 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office along with copy of Complaint. (cr5) |
| Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Michael D. French, TurboCode LLC. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by TurboCode LLC. (cr5) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by TurboCode LLC. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (DiNovo, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16738882), filed by TurboCode LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(DiNovo, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TurboCode LLC v. ZyXEL Communications Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TurboCode LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew G. DiNovo |
| Represented By: | Christopher V. Goodpastor |
| Represented By: | Michael Damian French |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ZyXEL Communications Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
