Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Mercatalyst, Inc. et al
| Yeti Coolers, LLC |
| Mercatalyst, LLC, TerraCycle US, LLC and Mercatalyst, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01337 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by TerraCycle US, LLC. (Guerrero, Cristina)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Peter G. Siachos for TerraCycle US, LLC. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Cristina Guerrero ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17027800) by on behalf of TerraCycle US, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Guerrero, Cristina)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Cristina Guerrero added to party TerraCycle US, LLC (pty:dft) by TerraCycle US, LLC.(Guerrero, Cristina)
|
|
Filing 12
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Mercatalyst, Inc.. (Radcliff, Robert)
|
|
Filing 11
Mercatalyst, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Attorney Robert K. Radcliff added to party Mercatalyst, Inc.(pty:dft) by Mercatalyst, Inc..(Radcliff, Robert).
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion for Leave entered by Judge Robert Pitman. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may serve a third-party subpoena on Woot, LLC prior to the Rule 26(f) conference. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jllc)
|
|
Filing 10
Unopposed MOTION for Discovery [for Leave to Serve Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule26(f) Conference] by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Whittlesey, David)
|
|
Filing 9
Pro Hac Vice Letter directed to Brooke Hauglid. (jv2)
|
|
Filing 8
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Yeti Coolers, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Yeti Holdings, Inc. for Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Whittlesey, David)
|
|
Filing 7
AGREED ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (pg)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Order [Agreed Order Granting Emergency Application for Temporary Restraining Order] to #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Whittlesey, David)
|
|
Filing 4
Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (rn)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Whittlesey, David)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(rn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 630), filed by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(rn)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (rn)
|
|
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (rn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
