Fyrst v. Baird
Plaintiff: Tyler Chet Fyrst
Respondent: FNU Barid and Joe Baird
Case Number: 1:2022cv01380
Filed: December 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Lane
Referring Judge: Lee Yeakel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 3/24/2023, Joinder of Parties due by 3/24/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 4/28/2023. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (cc3)
February 20, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to #5 Complaint . Attorney Michael A. Shaunessy added to party FNU Barid (pty:res) by FNU Barid.(Shaunessy, Michael)
February 7, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed FNU Joe Barid served on 1/25/2023, answer due 2/15/2023. (cc3)
January 23, 2023 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Joe Barid, Corporal (cc3)
January 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of TYLER CHET FYRST. Initial partial filing fee of ($0) assessed. Summons to be issued to defendant. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (cc3)
January 18, 2023 Filing 7 Letter/Correspondence from Tyler Chet Fyrst. (cc3)
January 18, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyler Chet Fyrst. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cc3)
January 18, 2023 Filing 5 COMPLAINT submitted per #4 ORDER, filed by Tyler Chet Fyrst.(cc3)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Plaintiff to provide civil-rights complaint and application for IFP. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil-Rights Complaint, #2 Blank Application for IFP)(cc3)
January 4, 2023 Filing 3 Case Opening Letter by Tyler Chet Fyrst. (rn)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (rn)
December 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee IS DUE $ 402.), filed by Tyler Chet Fyrst. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(rn)
December 28, 2022 Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rn)
December 28, 2022 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane (rn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fyrst v. Baird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler Chet Fyrst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FNU Barid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joe Baird
Represented By: Michael A. Shaunessy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?