Disu v. TekSystems, Inc.
Plaintiff: ADEDOYIN FAITH DISU
Defendant: TekSystems, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv00140
Filed: February 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Derek Allen McKee on behalf of TekSystems, Inc.. Attorney Derek Allen McKee added to party TekSystems, Inc.(pty:dft) (McKee, Derek)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Attorney entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Isaac Z. Treadaway is withdrawn as counsel. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
March 30, 2023 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney For Defendant by TekSystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Treadaway, Isaac)
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Setting Initial Pretrial Conference for 4/25/2023 09:00 AM before Judge Robert Pitman. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (bot2)
March 21, 2023 Filing 5 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by TekSystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Weber, Jason)
February 21, 2023 Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by TekSystems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent TEKsystems Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Allegis Group Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Allegis Group, Inc. for TekSystems, Inc.. (Weber, Jason)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Directing Isaac Z. Treadaway to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cr5)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cr5)
February 10, 2023 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5)
February 10, 2023 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5)
February 10, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TekSystems, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17070254), filed by TekSystems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Appendix)(Weber, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Disu v. TekSystems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADEDOYIN FAITH DISU
Represented By: Austin Harris Kaplan
Represented By: Matthew Barton Caponi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TekSystems, Inc.
Represented By: Jason T. Weber
Represented By: Isaac Zion Treadaway
Represented By: Derek Allen McKee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?