Aadnesen et al v. Central Mutual Insurance Company
| Christopher Aadnesen and Betty Aadnesen |
| Central Mutual Insurance Company |
| 1:2023cv00190 |
| February 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Lee Yeakel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Central Mutual Insurance Company.(Bowman, Russell) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (cr5)
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal by Central Mutual Insurance Company. (Bowman, Russell) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Betty Aadnesen, Christopher Aadnesen. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Lee Yeakel. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Central Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17103019), filed by Central Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bowman, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
