Haas v. NewRez LLC
| Kristina Jesterle Haas and Kristina Jesterle Montoya Haas |
| NewRez LLC |
| 1:2023cv00278 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 State Court Records Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant's Original Answer, #2 Exhibit State Court Notice of Removal)(Griffith, Camille) |
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2)
|
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (jv2) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jv2) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by NewRez LLC. (Griffith, Camille) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NewRez LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17196561), filed by NewRez LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-K)(Griffith, Camille) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
