Holzman v. Subaru of America Inc.
Sydney Holzman |
Subaru of America Inc and Subaru of America Inc. |
1:2023cv00293 |
March 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter directed to Nicole Zerunyan. (jv2) |
Filing 5 Defendant Subaru of America, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Edward A. Davis added to party Subaru of America Inc.(pty:dft) by Subaru of America Inc..(Davis, Edward) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sydney Holzman. Subaru of America Inc. served on 4/12/2023, answer due 5/3/2023. (Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Subaru of America Inc.. (cr5) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Sydney Holzman. (cr5) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (cr5) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Sydney Holzman. (Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17212811), filed by Sydney Holzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kimmel, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.