Bills v. Laughery et al
Jeremiah Anson Bills |
Sheriff Pat Laughery, Justice of the Peace Linda Hollenbaugh, City of Quanah, Hardeman County Sheriff's Office, Hardemen County, Child Protective Services, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Belong/SJRC Texas, Hondo Police Department, City of Hondo, Medina County and County Judge Ronald Ingram |
1:2023cv00352 |
March 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Medina County, re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Medina County (Tschirhart, Scott) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE to Defendant City of Hondo's Motion to Dismiss by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE to Defendant Hondo Police Department's Motion to Dismiss by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE to Defendant Texas Department of Family and Protective Services/Child Protective Services' Motion to Dismiss by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE to Defendant SJRC Texas, Inc., d/b/a Belong's Motion to Dismiss, by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Jeremiah Anson Bills, re #13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Medina County (jv2) |
Filing 17 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Defendant SJRC Texas, Inc. d/b/a Belong First Amended Motion to Dismiss , Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Belong/SJRC Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Granting Leave to File)(Vaughan, Monica) |
Filing 16 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Motion to Dismiss by City of Hondo, Hondo Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order on Amended Motion to Dismiss, #3 Proposed Order on Motion for Leave)(Frigerio, Charles) |
Text Order MOOTING #5 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Dkt. 12), this motion iS MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Text Order GRANTING #2 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Jeremiah Anson Bills is authorized to register for filing privileges via PACER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff consult the Website for the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (www.txwd.uscourts.gov), the CM/ECF tab, and follow the instructions to register for electronic filing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Text Order MOOTING #6 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Dkt. 12), this motion is MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Text Order MOOTING #9 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Dkt. 12), this motion iS MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Text Order MOOTING #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Dkt. 12), this motion is MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Motion to Dismiss Out of Time by Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Amended Motion to Dismiss)(Arroyo, Martin) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Motion to Dismiss Out of Time by Child Protective Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Amended Motion to Dismiss)(Arroyo, Martin) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Medina County. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Defendant Medina County's Motion to Dismiss)(Tschirhart, Scott) |
Text Order GRANTING #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to state a claim entered by Judge Robert Pitman. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to the motions to dismiss on or before June 1, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jeremiah Anson Bills.(jv2) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss, #6 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss>, #9 MOTION to Dismiss, #10 Motion to Dismiss, by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Belong/SJRC Texas. (Vaughan, Monica) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss. Attorney Martin Arroyo, Jr added to party Child Protective Services(pty:dft), Attorney Martin Arroyo, Jr added to party Texas Department of Family and Protective Services(pty:dft) by Child Protective Services, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services.(Arroyo, Martin) Modified on 4/24/2023 (jv2). |
Notice of Correction: re #9 MOTION to Dismiss. The filer selected the wrong event. The docket event the filer selected was Answer to Complaint. However, the document filed is a Motion to Dismiss. The docket clerk has changed the docket entry to a Motion to Dismiss. Please take note for future filing purposes. (jv2) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Hondo, Hondo Police Department #6 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss , #7 Deficiency Notice (Frigerio, Charles) |
Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #6 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss (jv2) |
Filing 6 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss by City of Hondo, Hondo Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Frigerio, Charles) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Medina County. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Defendant Medina County's Motion to Dismiss)(Tschirhart, Scott) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeremiah Anson Bills. All Defendants. (jv2) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Belong/SJRC Texas, Child Protective Services, City of Hondo, City of Quanah, Hardeman County Sheriff's Office, Hardemen County, Linda Hollenbaugh, Hondo Police Department, Ronald Ingram, Pat Laughery, Medina County, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. (jv2) |
Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 838), filed by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(jv2) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jv2) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower (jv2) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jeremiah Anson Bills. (jv2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.