Luckenbach Texas, Inc. v. Luckenbach Cattle Company, LLC
| Luckenbach Texas, Inc. |
| Luckenbach Cattle Company, LLC |
| 1:2023cv00547 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Report on Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office with Order. (pg) (Main Document 12 replaced on 7/13/2023) (pg). |
Filing 11
ORDER, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
| Case reassigned to Judge Robert Pitman. Judge Docket II - Austin no longer assigned to the case. (pg) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 9 AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg) |
| Filing 8 AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION to #1 Complaint, by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) Modified docket text entry and updated to reflect as a Motion instead of Proposed Order on 7/11/2023 (pg). |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Luckenbach Cattle Company, LLC. (klw) |
| Filing 6 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patricia Dolan-Galaviz on behalf of Luckenbach Texas, Inc. (Dolan-Galaviz, Patricia) |
| Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Katie Dolan-Galaviz. (cr5) |
| Filing 2 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office along with a copy of Complaint. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (cr5) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17446457). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Luckenbach Texas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burgess, Karen) (Attachment 5 replaced on 5/18/2023 to flatten document) (cr5). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Luckenbach Texas, Inc. v. Luckenbach Cattle Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luckenbach Texas, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Karen C. Burgess |
| Represented By: | Stacy Rogers Sharp |
| Represented By: | Patricia Dolan-Galaviz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Luckenbach Cattle Company, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
