Green v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
| James Green |
| T-Mobile US, Inc., Peter Osvaldik and Mike Sievert |
| 1:2023cv00570 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Mark Lane |
| Consumer Credit |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by James Green.(cc3) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Disregard Motion for More Definite Statement by James Green. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cc3) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for More Definite Statement by James Green. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cc3) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, due on or before 6/8/2023. Signed by Judge Mark Lane. (cc3)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER (dated 05/11/2023) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. Referral Magistrate Judge: Mark Lane. (cr5)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Green. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing Fee Due), filed by James Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
